Here’s the list and it looks smaller than one might have expected, only 21 proposals on the “matrix” to use a poor word choice. Number two is kindof interesting, proposed by DPD,
Remove the Sand Point policies from the Comprehensive Plan. Policy language incorporated into another planning document.
The Planning, Land Use, and Neighborhoods Committee is holding a public hearing on comp plan amendments March 31 at 5:00 in City Council Chambers. BTW, my guess is DPD is clarifying that the Sand Point policies are already incorporated into another planning document. Does anyone think that’s a neighborhood plan?
2 responses so far ↓
Rick // March 7, 2008 at 9:04 pm |
I’d guess that this would be to facilitate turning over public assets to for-profit organizations via long-term leases or any process that currently requires comp plan compatibility. I believe it would also make it a lot easier to evade SEPA in many cases. and generally make it much more difficult for citizens to get access to information or to appeal decisions.
Just guessing, of course.
maven // March 7, 2008 at 9:23 pm |
I’m guessing your guess is pretty good, Rick! Might even facilitate turning public assets over to non-profit organizations or agencies or…